|
Big Oil has profited from the sale of fossil fuels for the better part of a century, helping poison the atmosphere and speed global warming. In recent years, U.S. cities, states and environmental groups have turned to the courts, hoping to punish these energy giants. Specifically, they allege that executives hid their knowledge of humanity’s role in climate change while casting doubt on those who raised the alarm. A major test of this strategy got under way this week in Manhattan, as New York squares off against Exxon Mobil. Environmentalists hail the case as the first of its kind, but that label comes with a caveat. Instead of seeking to lay blame for the planetary crisis at the feet of oil companies, the trial is instead focusing on something more mundane:
whether Exxon cooked its books. —Josh Petri |
“The executive and legislative branches have largely abdicated their responsibility; that leaves the judiciary. The legal process is based on the discipline of evidence, and the evidence is extremely strong on climate change.” |
—Dan Abbasi, managing director of private equity firm GameChange Capital, on the unusual charges faced by Exxon in New York. |
Top stories | ||
|
||
What we’ve been reading | |||
|